<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Closing Chicago Real Estate &#187; Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/category/taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closingchicagorealestate.com</link>
	<description>Close Your Deals and Build Your Real Estate Business in the Second City and Beyond...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.5.2" -->
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2010 Closing Chicago Real Estate </copyright>
	<managingEditor>petero@olsonlawfirm.net</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>petero@olsonlawfirm.net</webMaster>
	<category>posts</category>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Close Your Deals and Build Your Real Estate Business in the Second City and Beyond...</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
	<itunes:author></itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name></itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>petero@olsonlawfirm.net</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>The Secret of Title Insurance</title>
		<link>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/900/the-secret-of-title-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/900/the-secret-of-title-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cook County Treasurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closingchicagorealestate.com/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;Powered by Max Banner Ads&#160; In transactional real estate land, title insurance is one of the most misunderstood products by lawyers and non-lawyers alike. Yet it needn&#8217;t be&#8230;if you understand what car/homeowners insurance does there&#8217;s no reason you shouldn&#8217;t have a basic understanding of what title insurance does. And this recently reported First District (Rhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://gogetterteam.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/title-insurance.jpg?w=300&amp;h=199" alt="" width="300" height="199" /><br />
In transactional real estate land, title insurance is one of the most misunderstood products by lawyers and non-lawyers alike. Yet it needn&#8217;t be&#8230;if you understand what car/homeowners insurance does there&#8217;s no reason you shouldn&#8217;t have a basic understanding of what title insurance does. And this recently reported First District (<a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2010/1stDistrict/May/1091216.pdf" target="_blank">Rhone v. First American, No. 1-09-1216</a>) case provides a nice back-drop for a rich and thorough title insurance discussion.</p>
<p>You really just need to understand a couple things and you&#8217;ll &#8220;get&#8221; title insurance just like you &#8220;get&#8221; car insurance. Every insurance policy will have some &#8220;effective date.&#8221; The confusing issue with title insurance is that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>whereas a car insurance policy would cover damage the day AFTER the policy&#8217;s &#8220;effective date&#8221; with title insurance, the policy would cover damage the day BEFORE the &#8220;effective date.&#8221;</strong></span> <em>Title insurance looks backward whereas the car insurance looks forward</em>. Okay?</p>
<p>The case above includes an interesting mix of property tax law and title insurance law. The Plaintiff&#8217;s close/buy (on) a Chicago townhome 8/31/06 that had been taxed as vacant land for 2004-2006 so it was undertaxed quite a bit for those 3 years. Interestingly, the parties to the real estate transaction DID have a tax reproration agreement but only for 2006 taxes (<span style="text-decoration: underline;">not &#8217;04-&#8217;05</span>).  In February 2008 the Plaintiff&#8217;s get a Cook County tax bill entitled, &#8220;2007 Omitted Assessment Property Tax Bill&#8221; from the county treasurer that charged them for the 2004 and 2005 taxes (no longer classified as vacant land). Plaintiff&#8217;s then make a claim against their title policy from First American which was denied.</p>
<p>In June 2008 they bring suit regarding First American&#8217;s failure to pay their claim for the 2004-2005 taxes. The appellate court sided with First American citing a mix of property tax and contact law. Obviously, the big question was how should the 2004-2005 taxes be viewed&#8230;are those obligations that arise in 2004-2005 whereby First American would be on the hook OR do they not actually arise until 2008 when the tax bill is issued. I won&#8217;t delve into the tax code too much here, but the court held that the property tax lien doesn&#8217;t arise until 2008 (for the 2004, 2005 taxes) therefore these bills weren&#8217;t covered on the title policy.</p>
<p>Putting on my real estate transaction lawyer hat for a second, this is a bit of a scary scenario and primarily because it&#8217;s not that easy to find-out previous year tax information for a property. For example, look at <a href="http://www.cookcountytreasurer.com/default.aspx" target="_blank">the Cook County Treasurer&#8217;s site</a>, it&#8217;s one click to look back one year but there&#8217;s not an obvious way to go back any further. And I do typically take a very close look at property taxes during a transaction. I suppose if you get something fishy like this case above where it&#8217;s a Chicago townhome that&#8217;s classified as vacant property you&#8217;ve got to really look under all the rocks to see what&#8217;s what.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=The+Secret+of+Title+Insurance+http://epesq.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=The+Secret+of+Title+Insurance+http://epesq.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/900/the-secret-of-title-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate News Round-Up:  1/16/10</title>
		<link>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/843/real-estate-news-round-up-11610/</link>
		<comments>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/843/real-estate-news-round-up-11610/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Condominiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sellers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News Roundup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closingchicagorealestate.com/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve been reading in real estate around the Web&#8230; Home Buyer (11/6/09 version) Tax Credit:  10 Things to Know. I sometimes call myself a real estate lawyer but have been admittedly slow in getting up to speed on the revised tax credit&#8230;I do get to celebrate a few holidays, no? For my money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what <a href="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/about/" target="_self">I&#8217;ve</a> been reading in real estate around the Web&#8230;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/personal-finance/taxes/10-things-you-should-know-about-the-new-homebuyer-credit/" target="_blank">Home Buyer (11/6/09 version) Tax Credit:  10 Things to Know</a></strong>. I sometimes call myself a real estate lawyer but have been admittedly slow in getting up to speed on the revised tax credit&#8230;I do get to celebrate a few holidays, no? For my money the big change is the $6,500 credit to home buyers who have previously used the same home as principal residence for at least 5 of the last 8 years. Also note that military members on extended duty outside the U.S. have until 4/30/11 (a year beyond the rest of us) to take advantage of the credit. For the most part, the &#8220;first time&#8221; homebuyer part of the credit remains the same expiring <span style="text-decoration: underline;">4/30/10</span> (or 6/30/10 for properties under contract by 4/30/10).</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-sat-brf-loan-modsjan16,0,4932683.story" target="_blank">Here</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/02/business/economy/02modify.html?emc=eta1" target="_blank">Here</a> are 2 somewhat complimentary stories on the success/not of the <a href="http://makinghomeaffordable.gov/" target="_blank">Making Home Affordable program</a>&#8230;one a more national and the other more Illinois focused</strong>. On the upside, mortgage loans <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ARE</span> now being modified (the lack of modification efforts used to be a favorite rant of mine). But, at least <em>in Illinois only 7% of the modifications are permanent</em>. So, does the program simply serve to lengthen the housing crisis by giving false hope to homeowners who in the end won&#8217;t be able to afford their homes in the end regardless??</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://content.kiplinger.com/columns/value/archive/dont-buy-a-house-yet.html" target="_blank">Don&#8217;t Buy a House&#8211;Yet</a></strong>. I think the op-ed makes a compelling argument&#8230;namely, real estate prices likely haven&#8217;t hit bottom and the market&#8217;s recovery will be agonizingly slow so what&#8217;s the rush? Foreclosure rates remain near their high and banks haven&#8217;t even fully released all of their inventory onto the market and the unemployment rate is going to remain around 10% through the end of this year&#8230;those are facts.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/chi-condo-townhome_chomes_1120nov20,0,5621537,full.story" target="_blank">Town house or condo</a></strong>. The difference isn&#8217;t always so obvious. Usually the townhomes are multi-story with the small front/backyard that you actually own whereas a condo is a self-contained unit on a single floor and the rest of the building is commonly owned. But it&#8217;s not always so stark&#8230;legally look at the declaration, a condo must use &#8220;condominium&#8221; is the legal title of the association and of course the Illinois Condominium Property Act governs condos but only section 18.5 governs town homes.</p>
<p><strong>And lastly&#8230;</strong><img class="alignleft" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/NA-BC818_WALKAW_NS_20091216184045.gif" alt="" width="441" height="161" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB126100260600594531-lMyQjAxMDI5NjExNzAxMDcyWj.html" target="_blank">Debtor&#8217;s Dilemma:  Pay the Mortgage or Walk Away</a></strong>. A fairly lengthy piece from the Journal focusing on people who CAN afford to pay their mortgage loans but are choosing not to based on the property&#8217;s plummeting value. Hard for me to empathize too much with these people&#8230;I think this debate is centered in futile, American vanity. Namely the focus on your home&#8217;s value&#8230;if you&#8217;re like what 75% of people who aren&#8217;t planning on relocating, you needn&#8217;t/shouldn&#8217;t care if your home value has dropped. Banks aren&#8217;t offering lines-of-credit anymore anyways. Sit back, take that mortgage interest deduction, and enjoy the view.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Real+Estate+News+Round-Up%3A++1%2F16%2F10+http://47a9d.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Real+Estate+News+Round-Up%3A++1%2F16%2F10+http://47a9d.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/843/real-estate-news-round-up-11610/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Festivus and I&#8217;ll Take the Property Tax Exemption Too</title>
		<link>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/714/happy-festivus-and-ill-take-the-property-tax-exemption-too/</link>
		<comments>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/714/happy-festivus-and-ill-take-the-property-tax-exemption-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Bluff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closingchicagorealestate.com/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The noted Seinfeldian holiday is honestly the first thing I thought about when I read this story about a Lake Bluff homeowner&#8217;s attempt to be exempt from property taxes by classifying his home as a church. The homeowner signed up to be an ordained minister with Spirtual Humanism and drew a cross with marker on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festivus" target="_blank">The noted Seinfeldian holiday</a> is honestly the first thing I thought about when I read <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-22-jul22,0,1308512.column" target="_blank">this story about a Lake Bluff homeowner&#8217;s attempt to be exempt from property taxes by classifying his home as a church</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.chicagotribune.com/media/photo/2009-07/48210717.jpg" alt="" width="311" height="218" /></p>
<p>The homeowner signed up to be an ordained minister with <a href="http://www.spiritualhumanism.org/" target="_blank">Spirtual Humanism</a> and drew a cross with marker on a photo of his home as proof that his home was a church. Interestingly, the state department of revenue initially approved the application before Lake Bluff challenged the exemption and it got overturned.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Happy+Festivus+and+I%E2%80%99ll+Take+the+Property+Tax+Exemption+Too+http://eacf8.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Happy+Festivus+and+I%E2%80%99ll+Take+the+Property+Tax+Exemption+Too+http://eacf8.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/714/happy-festivus-and-ill-take-the-property-tax-exemption-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate News Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/697/real-estate-news-round-up/</link>
		<comments>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/697/real-estate-news-round-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate News Roundup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closingchicagorealestate.com/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we&#8217;ve been reading the last week or so&#8230; The Second City is Becoming Second-Home City. I&#8217;m seeing this up close&#8230;we&#8217;ve had two closings in the last month where older, empty-nesters are buying second homes in downtown Chicago. Interesting commentary from a Swiss family who loves the vitality and affordability of Chicago and it&#8217;s easy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we&#8217;ve been reading the last week or so&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/greathomesanddestinations/10Chicago.html?_r=1&amp;emc=eta1" target="_blank">The Second City is Becoming Second-Home City</a>. I&#8217;m seeing this up close&#8230;we&#8217;ve had two closings in the last month where older, empty-nesters are buying second homes in downtown Chicago. Interesting commentary from a Swiss family who loves the vitality and affordability of Chicago and it&#8217;s easy to commute anywhere in the world. Chicago&#8217;s cool again.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/05/business/economy/05appeals.html?emc=eta1" target="_blank">Tax Bill Appeals Taking Rising Toll on Governments</a>. Well you knew this had to come, right? I&#8217;ve been impressed in my local community we&#8217;ve seen many municipal workers agreeing to not take pay raises and the like to control costs. I don&#8217;t know much about municipal governance but many local taxing bodies are capped at a 5% increase aroung Illinois so there may be more blood in the streets.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/business/29loanmod.html?emc=eta1&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">Paper Avalanche Buries Plan to Stem Foreclosures</a>. Just had to throw this in here&#8230;yada, yada, yada, yada multiplied by 50. A blurb exemplifying the problem:</p>
<p><em>Ms. Montenegro, an intern at a local company that seeks loan modifications, dials <a title="More articles about Washington Mutual Inc." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/washington_mutual_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Washington Mutual</a> to check on the status of an application for a homeowner whose income has plummeted. She endures a Muzak-scored purgatory while on hold. Syrupy-voiced customer service representatives chide her for landing in the wrong department. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>She learns that the documents her company sent in have simply vanished — for the third time since November</strong></span>.</em></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Real+Estate+News+Round-Up+http://kfw2i.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Real+Estate+News+Round-Up+http://kfw2i.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/697/real-estate-news-round-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leveraging the $8,000/$4,000 First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/571/leveraging-the-80004000-first-time-home-buyer-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/571/leveraging-the-80004000-first-time-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closingchicagorealestate.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heard a new twist on the above from an accountant friend I have breakfast with once in a while. He said he&#8217;s been advising clients and filing/amending tax returns claiming the first time homebuyer credit BEFORE people have actually purchased a home. In other words client is PLANNING on purchasing a home before the 12/1/09 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard a new twist on the above from an accountant friend I have breakfast with once in a while. He said he&#8217;s been advising clients and filing/amending tax returns claiming the first time homebuyer credit <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BEFORE</strong></span> people have actually purchased a home. In other words client is <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PLANNING</strong></span> on purchasing a home before the 12/1/09 cutoff but has <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>NOT</strong></span> actually bought it. He claims this is a great way to get money in a potential buyers pocket in advance of the purchase. <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204672,00.html" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s the IRS explanation of the credit</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Leveraging+the+%248%2C000%2F%244%2C000+First+Time+Home+Buyer+Tax+Credit+http://69ef3.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://closingchicagorealestate.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Leveraging+the+%248%2C000%2F%244%2C000+First+Time+Home+Buyer+Tax+Credit+http://69ef3.th8.us" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closingchicagorealestate.com/571/leveraging-the-80004000-first-time-home-buyer-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
