Orange, Red, and Yellow Line Extensions Approved by CTA Board

Posted: under Chicago.
Tags:

That’s real estate news, right? Some of the properties close (but not too close) to some of these extensions suddenly have easy convenience to public transportation…perhaps you can get a deal. The new routes sound logical, the end of the Skokie Swift up north could be a lot more convenient.

I wish Chicago had a single and more integrated system instead of the overlapping CTA elevated systems and Metra where one system essentially serves Chicago and a few inner-tier suburbs and one the farther out suburbs. I can walk to a Metra stop from my home but that only really helps me get to Chicago or the northwest suburbs…I should be able to walk to my Metra stop and seemlessly get virtually anywhere with another Metra stop without going downtown and waiting a while and often having to change train stations. I’d like to go to Kenosha or Naperville easily by just walking a couple blocks. The years I lived in Washington, D.C. with its Metro system I literally drove on average only about 10 miles per week.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Comments (0) Aug 12 2009

When is a ‘Closing’ Closed? And Short Sales…

Posted: under Buyers, Chicago.
Tags:


I was involved in a fairly long and frustrating closing over two days last week that by the skin of our teeth ended up okay but it really spurred my thinking about possible alternative scenarios that may have occurred.  Here’s what went down…

Closing had been scheduled for quite some time for last Wednesday but surprise, surprise our Buyer’s lender starts to have problems and reasons that cause delay.  So we push closing back to Thursday, no biggie and nothing too surprising to me.  Yet keep in mind, this is a short sale and Seller’s lender require their funds by Thursday…they will accept a wire so fine. Closing scheduled for Thursday @ 930am. My clients are signing their loan package locally in another state and Seller/attorney and I are handling sales/title docs here in Chicago. Due to what I’m hearing I KNOW this will be a slow closing so no biggie, I bring other work to do and schedule some other meetings downtown that day which I can handle as we’re waiting on the lender/money.

By Thursday, 2pm my clients are finally able to sign their loan package and their loan processor in FL wires funds up to Chicago title company…alright, all’s well that ends well. NOPE! Wire was sent to wrong recipient account here in Chicago and error isn’t realized until 4pm and that’s the cutoff time for wires, so we’re finished by not closed as of close of business on Thursday. Calls are made and Seller’s lender is okay if they get the payoff funds early Friday a.m.

By Friday I’ve mostly moved on to other things on my agenda and all that had to happen was a wire had to be re-sent Friday a.m., right? Yes, but I still got a call at 1pm, Friday from Seller’s attorney saying wire hadn’t hit in Chicago yet. Well, to bring this lurid tail to an end, wire hits around 2:30pm Friday and payoff wire to Seller’s mortgage holder gets out and then “it is finished.”


But this got me thinking about a couple things:

1. When is a closing closed?

–Is it when all docs are signed? Is it when wire has been sent (and there’s a Federal Reserve tracking #)? Is it when wire is actually received? This wasn’t so much an issue Friday as much as another transaction frankly where I had a psycho client/Seller. Client was a very nervous sort of person to start with and against our advice she opted to attempt to do back-to-back closings on one day. And at her Buyer’s purchase the wire was slow to hit which was going to delay her purchase that afternoon and all her stuff was on a moving truck and…just a combustible situation. So as her Buyer’s delay/wire lingers she’s saying I’m done, we’re not closing. But everything was concluded and all we were waiting on was a wire.  And it’s my understanding that a properly sent wire can’t be undone so it’s going to be received eventually. But what if like in my deal from last week it wasn’t sent to correct account and then Seller just rips up all the sales conveyance documents? Leaving contractual liability aside, is that a closing?

2. What if Seller’s lender above wouldn’t accept late payment or what if wire received at 4pm Friday and payoff wire couldn’t be sent until Monday?

–This is what I was really worried about last week. Once we got past the date that Seller mortgagee had agreed in writing to accept payoff, would they balk and say we’re not doing this now? Once my client’s purchase closed then I think their title insurance company would be on the hook for protecting them from anything that Seller’s mortgagee would do since that mortgage and the foreclosure case were waived at closing. But even if Buyer’s are covered who wants to buy a lawsuit regardless. Practically you’d think paying the Seller’s mortgagee a few bucks for the extra day would solve the problem.

Fun times in the real estate market!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Comments (0) Jul 29 2009

HUD’s Good Neighbor Next Door Program

Posted: under Buyers, Chicago.
Tags:

Just heard this referenced on TLC’s My First Home and had to post ’cause I had never heard of the program:

HUD’s Good Neighbor Next Door Program

A brief description…Law enforcement officers, pre-Kindergarten through 12th grade teachers and firefighters/emergency medical technicians can contribute to community revitalization while becoming homeowners through HUD’s Good Neighbor Next Door Sales Program. HUD offers a substantial incentive in the form of a discount of 50% from the list price of the home. In return you must commit to live in the property for 36 months as your sole residence.

From the look of things the one catch is many of the properties are in lets say transitional areas. While I’m on the subject, we just represented a Chicago Public School teacher who was elgible for a $3,000 closing cost credit for buying real estate in Chicago from CPS.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Comments (0) Jun 17 2009

Chicago Association of Realtors Form Contract

Posted: under Chicago.
Tags:

Did I mention how much I dislike several of the Chicago Association of Realtor form contracts that are pretty popular with City of Chicago real estate agents??

Most of my transactions involve Chicago property or North suburban property. In the suburban deals everybody uses the Multi-Board Contract and it seems that many Chicago agents are going that way but certainly not all.

We just got a Chicago contract in using the CAR contract and it’s simply laughable…I kid you not the only legible words on the contract are the title:  “Chicago Association of Realtors Condominium Real Estate Sale Contract.” And the primary problem:  Font size. Looking at the CAR contract side-by-side with the Multi-Board, the CAR must be font size 5 versus 10/11 for the Multi-Board. Hmmm…the ability to actually read the terms of a contract can be important, no?? After a few fax-backs you aren’t reading some form in font 5.

And second is the annoying notice provision in the CAR contract:

D. Notice. All notices required by this Contract shall be in writing and shall be served upon the Parties or their attorneys at the addresses provided in this Contract. The mailing of notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, shall be sufficient service when the notice is mailed. Notices may also be served by personal delivery or commercial delivery service, by mail-o-gram, telegram, or by the use of a facsimile machine with proof of transmission and a copy of the notice with proof of transmission being sent by regular mail on the date of transmission. In addition, facsimile signatures shall be sufficient for purposes of executing, negotiating, and finalizing this Contract. E-mail notices shall be deemed valid and received by the addressee when delivered by e-mail and opened by the recipient, provided that a copy of the e-mail notice is also sent by regular mail to the recipient on the date of transmission.

Just sent out an attorney modification/inspection letter out last night pursuant to this provision and unlike the Multi-Board, I have to ask to change notice provisions in my attorney modification letter & I have to both fax and mail my letter. Small stuff, but oh so bothersome.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Comments (8) Jun 03 2009

A Closing Story: Client Expectations and Attorney Error

Posted: under Chicago, Sellers.

So I’m going to be self-critical here and remind readers of a recent change to Chicago’s water certification ordinance. I posted about this change here so I surely was aware of it. And before this closing yesterday I’d actually double-checked with our title company because I did recall the change…so it may have been yours truly mis-reading his notes or perhaps being misled by title company so they could charge an extra fee.

The issue is a water bill that’s part of and paid by the condominium association. Until 18 months ago there was no City water fee on that transaction but now there’s a $50 fee on that deal. But many of the big title companies downtown can just tie into the City’s water department and pay it at closing for an extra fee of course.

So we’re not talkin’ huge dollars but I hadn’t prepared my client for this charge and he wasn’t thrilled when he learned of it. He was losing money on the deal and every $$ counted, yada, yada, yada. But client expectations are important as I wrote about here.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Comments (0) May 23 2009